Theory of mind in dementias
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57167/Rev-SBPH.15.393Keywords:
Theory of mind, DementiaAbstract
Theory of Mind (ToM) concerns to ability to infer mental states to himself and others, in order to understand and foretell behaviors. Aspects of ToM in diseases like autism and schizophrenia are already established in literature, however their behaviors in dementia, especially the cortical, has been scarcely addressed. These, on the order hand, are characterized by deficits in several cognitive fields, with damage to the life of the relationship of these individuals. The aim of this study was to go along a brief review of the literature concerning the subject and discuss some of their findings. Procedure was a literature review using the MEDLINE, LILACS, PORTAL CAPES and SCIELO. The key words used in English and Portuguese, respectively, were: Theory of Mind, Theory of Mind and Dementia, the criteria were year of publication (from 2000) and relevance of the topic. We found and described 4 articles involved in the proposed subject, as well as articles that relate the findings to neural bases circumscribed. The literature associates changes in ToM to dementia, with particular depending on the type and neural substrate involved. Accordingly the frontal variant frontotemporal dementia, appears to be the prototype of this condition, knowing, however, that several brain areas are involved and interconnected in the processing of ToM.
Downloads
References
Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2003). Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 267–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01501-1
Baron-Cohen, S.; O'Riordan M.; Jones, R., Stone, V. & Plaisted, K. (1999). A new test of social sensitivity: Detection of faux pas in normal children and children with Asperger syndrome, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29,407-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023035012436
Baron-Cohen, S.; Wheelwright, S.; Scahill, V.; Lawson, J. & Spong, A. (2001). Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent? A test with children with Asperger Syndrome, Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders 5, 47-78.
Becchio, C., Adenzato, M., & Bara, B. G. (2006). How the brain understands intention: Different neural circuits identify the componential features of motor and prior intentions. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 64–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.03.006
Caixeta, L. & Nitrini, R. (2002). Teoria da mente: uma revisão com enfoque na sua incorporação pela psicologia médica. Psicologia: reflexão e crítica, 15(1), 105-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722002000100012
Ciaramidaro, A., Adenzato, M., Enrici, I., Erk, S., Pia, L., Bara, B. G. et al. (2007). The intentional network:Howthe brain reads varieties of intentions. Neuropsychologia, 45, 3105–3113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.011
Cuerva, A. G.; Sabe, L. P., Kuzis, G; Tiberti, C.; Dorrego, F. & Starkstein, S. E. Theory of Mind and Pragmatic Abilities in Dementia. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 14(3), 153–158, 2001.
Dias, M. G. B. B. Até quando preciso usar a imaginação? (1992). Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 8, 351-361.
Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 581–604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00025-7
Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, Biological Sciences, 358, 459–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1218
Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 77–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00025-6
Gregory, C.; Lough, S.; Stone, V.; Erzinclioglu, S.; Martin, L.; Baron-Cohen, S. & Hodges, J. R. (2002). Theory of mind in patients with frontal variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer´s disease: theoretical and practical implications. Brain, 125, 752-754.Jou, G. I. & Sperb, T. M.(1999). Teoria da Mente: diferentes abordagens. Psicol. Reflex. Crit, 2, 287-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf079
Kosmidis, M. H; Aretouli, E.; Bozikas, V. P.; Giannakou, M. & Ioannidis, P. Mary H. (2008). Studying social cognition in patients with schizophrenia and patients with frontotemporal dementia: Theory of mind and the perception of sarcasm. Behavioural Neurology, 19, 65–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/157356
Modinos, G.; Obiols, J. E.; Pousa, E. & Vicens, J. (2009). Theory of Mind in Different Dementia Profiles, J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neuroci, 21(1), 100-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.21.1.100
Neto, J. G.; Tamelini, M. G. & Florlenza, O.V. (2005). Diagnóstico Diferencial das Demências, Rev. Psiq. Clín., 32 (3); 119-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832005000300004
Premack, D. & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a “theory of mind”? Behaviour and Brain Sciencies, 4, 515-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512
Saxe, R. (2006). Uniquely human social cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 235–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.001
Saxe, R., & Powell, L. J. (2006). It’s the thought that counts: Specific brain regions for one component of theory of mind. Psychological Science, 17, 692–699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01768.x
Walter, H., Adenzato, M., Ciaramidaro, A., Enrici, I., Pia, L., & Bara, B. G. (2004). Understanding intentions in social interaction: The role of the anterior paracingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1854–1863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929042947838
Wimmer, H. & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about belief: Representation and constraining fuction of wrong beliefs in young children´s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The publication adopts the CreativeCommons “Attribution 4.0 International” license – CC BY, which allows “copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.” Also, according to the CC BY license, authors must “give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.” These changes must be indicated without suggesting that the journal supports their use. More information about the license from: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en






